Diagnostics · semantic
semantic[duplicate-contract]
Two contracts with the same name in one source.
Contract names identify decisions (<Contract>.<id>), so they are unique within a source.
Example
compileSourceCONTRACT Claim {
ENFORCEMENT_MODE: enforced
CONTEXT {
ENTITIES Request {
count: int
region: string
ready: bool
ratio: float
}
CONSTANTS {
zero: int == 0 [SOURCE:POLICY]
cap: int == 25 [SOURCE:POLICY]
}
}
TRIGGER {
grant()
}
GUARANTEE {
ENSURE grant() WHEN Request.ready == true [SOURCE:must_be_ready]
}
PROHIBITION {
FORBID grant WHEN Request.count > cap [SOURCE:over_cap]
}
}
CONTRACT Claim {
ENFORCEMENT_MODE: enforced
CONTEXT {
ENTITIES Request {
count: int
region: string
ready: bool
ratio: float
}
CONSTANTS {
zero: int == 0 [SOURCE:POLICY]
cap: int == 25 [SOURCE:POLICY]
}
}
TRIGGER {
grant()
}
GUARANTEE {
ENSURE grant() WHEN Request.ready == true [SOURCE:must_be_ready]
}
PROHIBITION {
FORBID grant WHEN Request.count > cap [SOURCE:over_cap]
}
}rejected semantic[duplicate-contract] at 26:1 duplicate contract Claim
Fix
compileSourceCONTRACT Claim {
ENFORCEMENT_MODE: enforced
CONTEXT {
ENTITIES Request {
count: int
region: string
ready: bool
ratio: float
}
CONSTANTS {
zero: int == 0 [SOURCE:POLICY]
cap: int == 25 [SOURCE:POLICY]
}
}
TRIGGER {
grant()
}
GUARANTEE {
ENSURE grant() WHEN Request.ready == true [SOURCE:must_be_ready]
}
PROHIBITION {
FORBID grant WHEN Request.count > cap [SOURCE:over_cap]
}
}
CONTRACT Revoke {
ENFORCEMENT_MODE: enforced
CONTEXT {
ENTITIES Request {
count: int
region: string
ready: bool
ratio: float
}
CONSTANTS {
zero: int == 0 [SOURCE:POLICY]
cap: int == 25 [SOURCE:POLICY]
}
}
TRIGGER {
grant()
}
GUARANTEE {
ENSURE grant() WHEN Request.ready == true [SOURCE:must_be_ready]
}
PROHIBITION {
FORBID grant WHEN Request.count > cap [SOURCE:over_cap]
}
}accepted
See also: the specification.